Choosing antivirus protection is often very difficult. The market is highly cut-throat and the products are on technologically advanced information technology.
Antivirus providers have both the knowledge (gained in day-to-day war using cybercriminals) and money for you to wage an epic brand struggle in the field of the pc security. There are a lot of vendors every one of them is pushing a large number of features in their product toward the market. How do you really choose from them? Let me try to proceed deep into this topic in this article.
Security is dull
Security is always in discord with usability. Whether you’re working with your documents, playing video games, or watching a movie, absolutely no security measures or methods actually help you with your action. On the contrary, they’re messing around — slowing down your computer, asking for various passwords, forcing you to select an appropriate folder to save your own files in, and so on.
Indeed, I understand the necessity; a protection payload is a price for one’s safety, but it’s just simply no fun at all. Current marketing tries to get people engaged, to have fun, and to take delivery of some kind of closure by using a solution. What kind of closure can you be expecting from antivirus software?
The sole thing you need from an antivirus solution might be to shut up and may help viruses. That’s why antivirus distributors never have a huge fan base. MISPLACED has 7. 5 zillion fans on Facebook, and Symantec has 35 thousand.
To produce matters worse, almost no security and safety measure gives you a guarantee or any other kind of psychological closure. Take into account the movie “Mission Impossible”? Clearly, there was a very well-protected computer nevertheless Tom Cruise came and also hacked it. With virtually any antivirus product, there is always an opportunity that viruses still enter your defense. That’s merely sad.
Race without end
Anti-virus software developers are continually in a war with cyber criminals and with each other.
There are a lot of approaches to earn money on the Internet illegally: spam, prescription drug revenue, pornography, gambling, identity fraud, credit card fraud, and so on. And the location where the money is, bright (but devious) minds apply their particular knowledge to get it. Every single day, criminals are trying to find a fresh way to infect your Computers.
When a new virus is established, it’s tested against the most essential antivirus protections; they must be unable to detect it. Then they have pushed “into the wild” and start to do dirty work. Antivirus software facilities around the world are working 24x7x365 seeking to detect new viruses by means of “honey pots” and some techniques. Normally, when they do have an example, it’s not very hard to build a cure. Within hours (sometimes minutes) after detection, the technology of this particular vendor can certainly and will protect you against that virus. (The top anti-virus brands also have proactive prevention of yet unknown viruses. Many people try to analyze the behavior connected with any new program, in addition, to define whether it’s malware or not. But the intelligence regarding such programs is still of low quality. )
Normally, all major anti-virus labs in the world exchange advice about the latest viruses with each other. And we can assume that all the anti-virus products are very good at getting new viruses. The problem is that will hundreds of new viruses are usually developed every day. You never realize when somebody will make a blunder and let one go.
Seems as though a Formula-1 race. We realize that all the cars are good. Could possibly be actually 99. 99% in close proximity to perfect, and the drivers usually are geniuses. However, they have to completely overcome each other. Somebody will make a miscalculation and be “not-so-perfect” this time.
Anti-virus vendors have to race every day, 24 hours per day on a Formula-1 track in order to prove their performance.
Size does topic
The first logical thought should be to try to find the leaders available. Who’s selling more anti-virus products in the world? Maybe these people better at what they do along with the “invisible hand” of the industry have already picked the preferred.
According to Softwaretop100, the biggest online businesses are:
Symantec
McAfee
Trend Small
(Kaspersky is aggressively craving 3rd place)
The rest tend to be smaller.
However, this doesn’t contain a so-called “free antivirus” application. This means a vendor will be giving a basic version of this security software absolutely infundadamente and earns money with extended products or services. Free is often a magic word, and as per some sources, free anti-virus protection is installed on 50 percent to 60% of all desktops in the world! The leaders in the free antivirus industry usually are:
avast!
AVG
Avira
The presents start with A, and all of these individuals are European (Avira will be German, avast! and AVG are from the Czech Republic)
Independent testing
There are indie labs that try to execute testing of the antivirus defense products to see how properly they perform in the never-ending race. Let’s see if we can easily find which antivirus technique is best
AV-Test
AV-Test checks 20+ products and releases a summary every quarter. They give a new score from 0 to six in three categories (protection, repair, usability) and the most awful products don’t get “certified”.
Take a look at see who got the highest mark in protection:
the new year Q2: AVG, G Files, Symantec, Panda
2010 Q3: Kaspersky, PC Tools
the new year Q4: BitDefender, BullGuard, Kaspersky, Panda
2011 Q1: BitDefender
I don’t see just about any particular leader here. For a number of months some vendors work best, and another month another one is usually.
Let’s see how the 3 clear market leaders (Symantec, Security software, Trend Micro) are undertaking this test:
Symantec: five. 5, 5. 0, five. 0, 5. 5 (almost top scores)
McAfee: five. 0, 3. 5, three. 5, 3. 0 (not good)
Trend Micro: second. 5, 4. 0, four. 5, 3. 5 (not good at all)
AV-Comparatives
AV-Comparatives tests around 20 items almost every month and has numerous tests to show performance within antivirus protection.
Almost all the actual leaders detect more than 九成 of viruses, but there are actually those that detect close to completion.
Let’s see who is the top in on-demand detection:
February 2010: G Data, Avira, Panda
Aug 2010: Grams Data, TrustPort, McAfee
February 2011: G Data, TrustPort, avast!
G Data is apparently doing very well. Strange that must be not always the best according to AV-Test.
Let’s monitor the market commanders by their position from the top 20:
Symantec: 7, some, 12 (medium positions)
The security software: 5, 3, 10 (close to the top)
Trend Tiny: 18, 13, 13 (almost always close to the bottom)
“Bottom” in this case means > 九成 detection; We’re talking about 九成 of thousands of newest and also the most dangerous virus risks, so I guess it’s adequate anyway.
Virus Bulletin
Pathogen Bulletin is the most advanced website, measuring the widest array of vendor products and giving by far the most extensive results. They have a good amount of historical data on anti-virus product performance. Let’s acquire their RAP (Reactive along with Proactive) test from August 2010 to April right before Christmas.
The best vendors were: Trustport, Coranti, Avira, G Files, Kaspersky.
How are the commanders doing?
Symantec: ~90%-80% (definitely top quadrant)
McAfee: ~ 75%-75% (average results)
Development Micro has been boycotting this particular test for 3 years (hmm)
What can be said regarding antivirus protection, if it’s examined by independent sources?
– The results don’t match. Very different vendors come to the top as well as fall to the bottom with no indication of why
– Top sales vendors tend to be average or below average within their protection level and the greatest places are awarded in order to small companies
– A similar vendor can show a superb result on the same test in fact and drop down a year later
rapid Websites of the antivirus providers are filled with certifications from one of these three labs. Every single 52 vendor has a minimum of one. I’m not sure how to assess them based on this information.
Benefits of the fourth estate
There are a lot of computer system magazines. And they’re issued monthly. Marketing research says that guidance from computer news resources is one of the most important factors in the decision-making of antivirus item customers.
I’ve gathered info from a number of PC mags, both online and offline. Let us notice which antivirus products they presume is the best one:
Dennis Technologies Labs, “PC Total Safety Suites 2011, ” Feb 2011
Best Choices: Symantec, Trend Micro, Webroot
PassMark Software, “Consumer Security Items Performance Benchmarks (Edition several Feb. 2011), ” March 2011.
Best Choises: Symantec, ESET, G-Data
ConsumerSearch
Very best Choices: Symantec, avast!, Sophos
TopTenReviews
Best Choices: BitDefender, Kaspersky, Webroot
Antiviruscompare
Very best Choices: ESET, Symantec, Security software
PCM
Best Choices: K7, Symantec, Kaspersky
CNet
Finest Choices: Kaspersky, Mcafee, TrendMicro
I could continue posting a multitude of examples, but I think I’ve truly made my point. Opt for any of the 52 vendors in addition there will be an IT newspaper that will rank it no 1.
What do vendors say in relation to themselves?
Marketers are showing stories. Inside many anti-virus vendors, there is a marketing tool called a “battle card”. It’s a set of the features of their product and also a comparison with the competition.
This is certainly of course not public information, yet it’s available more-or-less publicly to software sales route partners – distributors and also resellers. You can Google somewhat and find examples of research and also comparative tables issued by the vendors themselves.
(Disclaimer: these records are provided as is along with the way I’ve obtained the item – via Google instructions is subject to critique. )
In order to get examples of such “battle cards”, please Google the name of a new vendor + “battle card” and you may surely get some interesting benefits.
What to do?
Choosing an anti-virus product is like choosing a car or truck. Everybody has their preferences, in addition to vendor marketing machines commit millions in order to change all of our opinions. But there are not any Ferraris or Porsches among the many antivirus products, just a big row of mid-size passenger sedans.
You do need one, beyond doubt.
But if you need to choose within antivirus software – may! Select the one you’re making use of today or the one that your current engineer friend likes. Or maybe the one recommended by the THAT department of your company. If either of the products is causing you efficiency problems, choose another one. In case you have 5 PCs at home as well as the subscription becomes pricey, pick a cheaper one.
A much more exciting question is how to buy anti-virus software. What do you need to know so that you can purchase the software safely, quickly, and for the best price? Unfortunately, this is certainly beyond the scope of the article.
Read also: Spectrum Internet Troubleshooting